The Utility of Prevena Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Groin Incisions for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is an adjunctive treatment that uses constant negative pressure suction to facilitate healing. The utility of this treatment modality on vascular operations for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has yet to be elucidated. This study compares the incidence of postoperative wound complications between the Prevena Incision Management System, a type of iNPWT, and standard wound dressings for vascular patients who also underwent plastic surgery closure of groin incisions for CLTI. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with CLTI who underwent 53 open vascular surgeries with subsequent sartorius muscle flap closure. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, and wound complications were measured from 2015 to 2018 at the University of California San Francisco. Two cohorts were generated based on the modality of postoperative wound management and compared on wound healing outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 53 groin incisions, 29 were managed with standard dressings, and 24 received iNPWT. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Patients who received iNPWT had a significantly lower rate of infection (8.33% vs 31.0%, P = 0.04) and dehiscence (0% vs 41.3%, P < 0.01). Furthermore, the iNPWT group had a significantly lower rate of reoperation (0% vs 17.2%, P = 0.03) for wound complications within 30 days compared with the control group and a moderately reduced rate of readmission (4.17% vs 20.7%, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of infection, reoperation, and dehiscence were significantly reduced in patients whose groin incisions were managed with iNPWT compared with standard wound care. Readmission rates were also decreased, but this difference was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that implementing iNPWT for the management of groin incisions, particularly in patients undergoing vascular operations for CLTI, may significantly improve clinical outcomes.

Functional donor-site morbidity following reconstruction with pectoralis major flaps: A systematic review.

Background: Pectoralis major muscle/myocutaneous flaps (PMMFs) are commonly used in reconstructive surgery, but may result in shoulder disability on the donor side. A systematic review evaluating this morbidity could be beneficial for guiding patients and providers considering this procedure. Methods: In October 2022, a systematic review of studies evaluating quantitative/qualitative measures of functional morbidity after PMMF was conducted. The results were categorized into PMMF's effect on range of motion (ROM), strength, and ability to complete shoulder-related activities/quality of life. Results: Eleven studies were included for analysis, which analyzed standard PMMF and two PMMF variants that spared portions of the muscle. Three of five studies demonstrated reduced shoulder ROM for standard PMMF versus controls lasting at least 4 months after head and neck reconstruction. Two of five studies, including two prospective studies demonstrated reduced shoulder strength for standard PMMF versus controls lasting at least 3 months after surgery. Five of nine studies found significant impairment in the ability to conduct shoulder-related activities, including work, up to one year postoperatively for standard PMMF versus controls. Muscle-sparing PMMF variants exhibited more promising outcomes in some categories. Conclusion: Standard PMMF results in prolonged reductions in shoulder ROM and strength, which may impair patients in shoulder-related activities. Other reconstructive options should be considered in patients who frequently participate in such activities. For patients requiring PMMF, muscle-sparing PMMF variants should be considered as alternatives to the standard PMMF.

Instrument and Supply Variability: An Opportunity to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of the Operating Room.

INTRODUCTION: Reducing costs and carbon footprints are important, parallel priorities for the US health-care system. Within surgery, reducing the number of instruments that are sterilized and disposable supplies that are used for each operation may help achieve both goals. We wanted to measure the existing variability in surgical instrument and supply choices and assess whether standardization could have a meaningful cost and environmental impact. METHODS: We analyzed surgeon preference cards for common general surgery operations at our hospital to measure the number of sterilizable instrument trays and supplies used by each surgeon for each operation. From this data, we calculated supply costs, carbon footprint, and median operative time and studied the variability in each of these metrics. RESULTS: Among the ten operations studied, variability in sterilizable instrument trays requested on surgeon preference cards ranged from one to eight. Variability in disposable supplies requested ranged from 17 to 45. Variability in open supply costs ranged from $104 to $4184. Variability in carbon footprint ranged from 17 to 708 kg CO2e. If the highest-cost surgeon for each operation switched their preference card to that of the median-cost surgeon, $245,343 in open supply costs and 41,708 kg CO2e could be saved. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in the instrument and supply choices of surgeons performing common general surgery operations. Standardizing this variability may lead to meaningful cost savings and carbon footprint reduction, especially if scaled across the entire health system.

Long- versus short-duration systemic corticosteroid regimens for acute exacerbations of COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and cohort studies.

While systemic corticosteroids quicken patient recovery during acute exacerbations of COPD, they also have many adverse effects. The optimal duration of corticosteroid administration remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare patient outcomes between short- (≤7 days) and long- (>7 days) corticosteroid regimens in adults with acute exacerbations of COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and hand searches were used to identify eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS-I. Data were summarized as ORs (odds ratios) or MDs (mean differences) whenever possible and qualitatively described otherwise. A total of 11532 participants from eight RCTs and three retrospective cohort studies were included, with 1296 from seven RCTs and two cohort studies eligible for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was present in the methodology and settings of the studies. The OR (using short duration as the treatment arm) for mortality was 0.76 (95% CI = 0.40-1.44, n = 1055). The MD for hospital length-of-stay was -0.91 days (95% CI = -1.81--0.02 days, n = 421). The OR for re-exacerbations was 1.31 (95% CI = 0.90-1.90, n = 552). The OR for hyperglycemia was 0.90 (95% CI = 0.60-1.33, n = 423). The OR for infection incidence was 0.96 (95% CI = 0.59-1.156, n = 389). The MD for one-second forced expiratory volume change was -18.40 mL (95% CI = -111.80-75.01 mL, n = 161). The RCTs generally had low or unclear risks of bias, while the cohort studies had serious or moderate risks of bias. Our meta-analyses were affected by imprecision due to insufficient data. Some heterogeneity was present in the results, suggesting population, setting, and treatment details are potential prognostic factors. Our evidence suggests that short-duration treatments are not worse than long-duration treatments in moderate/severe exacerbations and may lead to considerably better outcomes in milder exacerbations. This supports the current GOLD guidelines. Trial registration: Our protocol is registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023374410.

Comparing Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics Administration for Cellulitis Infection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cellulitis is defined as an infection of the skin that is usually characterized by localized but poorly demarcated areas of erythema, swelling, and pain. Erysipelas is a subtype of cellulitis that is characterized by a more superficial infection, often involving the face. Because gram-positive bacteria are the most common infective agent, beta-lactam antibiotics such as cephalosporins are commonly used. However, guidelines and physician preference vary widely as different antibiotic options and routes of administration exist, in addition to the fact that most cases are treated empirically without microbiological lab guidance. This lack of standardization in evidence, guidelines, and physician practice prompted this systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized trial data and cohort studies to aggregate the currently available evidence for the optimal routes of antibiotic administration in cellulitis treatment. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our review is to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous antibiotic administration for cellulitis infections, thereby providing clinicians with evidence-based guidelines for treatment. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL through Ovid as well as Web of Science and CINAHL for all available literature comparing different routes of antibiotic administration in the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas. We will perform title and abstract as well as full-text screening in duplicate according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and then extract the relevant data using a prepiloted data sheet. The primary outcome for our review is the duration of infection resolution, and secondary outcomes such as incidence of sepsis, mortality, hospital admission, and Clostridium difficile infection. We will assess the risk of bias in our included studies using the RoB 2.0 (revised tool for Risk of Bias in randomized trials) and ROBINS-I (Risk of bias in non-randomized studies for interventions) tools, with a final quality assessment using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework and a sensitivity analysis to examine heterogeneity. RESULTS: We will publish the final results of our systematic review in a peer-reviewed academic journal. This project received no funding or financial assistance. Data analysis is currently underway, and the results are expected to be submitted for publication in late November 2023. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this will be the most up-to-date review of the best available evidence comparing different routes of antibiotic administration for cellulitis. Because of the vast selection of antibiotic options available and the empirical nature of the treatment, we anticipate heterogeneity within our data but nonetheless hope to provide aggregated evidence on the efficacy of intravenous versus oral administration of antibiotics in cellulitis treatment. We hope the results from this study will better inform physician practices in the future for cellulitis infections. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/48342.

Efficacy of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index in Predicting Surgical-Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Breast Implant Augmentation: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Based 5-Year Study.

Background: The ability to predict breast implant augmentation complications can significantly inform patient management. A frailty measure, such as the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), is becoming an increasingly established risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. The authors hypothesized that the mFI-5 is predictive of 30-day postoperative complications in breast augmentation. Objectives: To investigate if mFI-5 can predict the likelihood and magnitude of 30-day complications resulting from breast augmentations. Methods: A retrospective review study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for patients who underwent breast implant augmentation without other concurrent procedures, from 2015 to 2019. Age, BMI, number of major comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications, smoking status, mFI-5 score, and modified Charlson comorbidity index score were compared as predictors of all-cause 30-day complications and 30-day surgical-site complications using regression analyses. Results: Overall, 2478 patients were analyzed, and among them, 53 patients developed complications (2.14%). mFI-5 score significantly predicted surgical-site infection (SSI) complications (odds ratio [OR] = 4.24, P = .026). Frail patients had a higher occurrence of SSIs than nonfrail patients (P = .049). Multivariable analyses showed ASA class predicted 30-day SSI complications (OR = 5.77, P = .027) and mFI-5 approached, but did not reach full significance in predicting overall 30-day complications (OR = 3.14, P = .085). Conclusions: To date, the impact of frailty on breast implant procedure outcomes has not been studied. Our analysis demonstrates that the mFI-5 is a significant predictor for SSIs in breast implant augmentation surgery and is associated with overall complications. By preoperatively identifying frail patients, the surgical team can better account for postoperative support to minimize the risk of complications.

Duration and dosing of systemic corticosteroids for acute exacerbation of COPD, protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials and cohort studies.

PURPOSE: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a leading cause of deterioration in patients with otherwise stably controlled COPD. Treatments of AECOPD often require the use of corticosteroid therapy in conjunction with bronchodilators and antibiotics. However, the duration and dosage of corticosteroids still remain unclear. We propose to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis of all available randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of different corticosteroid duration and dosing regimen in the current body of evidence. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL via Ovid as well as CINAHL and Web of Science for available literature comparing different corticosteroid duration and dosage in the treatment of AECOPD. We will perform title and full text screening in duplicate, then extract relevant data using a pre-piloted extraction form. We will define short duration as less than 14-day duration of treatment and long duration as greater than 14-day treatment. We will report mortality difference as our primary outcome, with additional comparisons in incidence of re-exacerbation, hospital length of stay, lung function, incidence of hyperglycemia and infection. We will perform risk of bias assessment using the ROB2.0 and ROBINS-I tool, as well as the GRADE assessment to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: We will publish the full results of our systematic review and meta-analysis in a peer-reviewed journal. DISCUSSIONS: To our knowledge, this represents an updated and most comprehensive review of the literature comparing different duration and dosing regimen of corticosteroid treatments in AECOPD, as we will include both RCTs and observational studies without date or language restrictions. We aim to validate prior meta-analyses and study findings on the efficacy of short duration corticosteroid therapy over longer treatments and to inform future research directions in dosing regimens.

IL-6 blockade reverses bone marrow failure induced by human acute myeloid leukemia.

Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) die from complications arising from cytopenias resulting from bone marrow (BM) failure. The common presumption among physicians is that AML-induced BM failure is primarily due to overcrowding, yet BM failure is observed even with low burden of disease. Here, we use large clinical datasets to show the lack of correlation between BM blast burden and degree of cytopenias at the time of diagnosis. We develop a splenectomized xenograft model to demonstrate that transplantation of human primary AML into immunocompromised mice recapitulates the human disease course by induction of BM failure via depletion of mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor populations. Using unbiased approaches, we show that AML-elaborated IL-6 acts to block erythroid differentiation at the proerythroblast stage and that blocking antibodies against human IL-6 can improve AML-induced anemia and prolong overall survival, suggesting a potential therapeutic approach.

Enasidenib drives human erythroid differentiation independently of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2.

Cancer-related anemia is present in more than 60% of newly diagnosed cancer patients and is associated with substantial morbidity and high medical costs. Drugs that enhance erythropoiesis are urgently required to decrease transfusion rates and improve quality of life. Clinical studies have observed an unexpected improvement in hemoglobin and RBC transfusion-independence in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with the isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutant-specific inhibitor enasidenib, leading to improved quality of life without a reduction in AML disease burden. Here, we demonstrate that enasidenib enhanced human erythroid differentiation of hematopoietic progenitors. The phenomenon was not observed with other IDH1/2 inhibitors and occurred in IDH2-deficient CRISPR-engineered progenitors independently of D-2-hydroxyglutarate. The effect of enasidenib on hematopoietic progenitors was mediated by protoporphyrin accumulation, driving heme production and erythroid differentiation in committed CD71+ progenitors rather than hematopoietic stem cells. Our results position enasidenib as a promising therapeutic agent for improvement of anemia and provide the basis for a clinical trial using enasidenib to decrease transfusion dependence in a wide array of clinical contexts.